HOME
|
CONTACT US
OVERVIEW
WHO SHOULD ATTEND
REGISTRATION
SCHEDULE & PRESENTATIONS
PRE/POST CONFERENCE MEETINGS
EXHIBITS & ADVERTISING
STATE MEETINGS
PRESENTER INFORMATION
*Submit An Abstract
CEU's
ANTONIA BRANCIA MAXON AWARD FOR EHDI EXCELLENCE
HOTEL INFORMATION
TRAVEL
THINGS TO DO
PAST CONFERENCES
Overall Conference Evaluation Form
Please mark all of the following entities that you represent:
Advocacy Group
Audiologist
Early Intervention Provider
Family of a child with hearing loss
Federal Agency
Hospital/Birthing Center
Local Health Dept
Medical Provider
Non-Profit Agency
Part C Agency/Provider
State Education Agency
State Health Department
Student
University
Other
If Other, (please specify):
Conference Goal:
The goal of this conference is to enhance the implementation of comprehensive state-based Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) programs
Please select the number that best represents your opinion regarding the
entire conference
.
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
I am confident that I can promote knowledge/awareness of successful EHDI implementation strategies.
1
2
3
4
5
2. I am confident that I can share current research and research methods related to EHDI.
1
2
3
4
5
3. I am confident that I can improve cultural competence in working with children/families/communities.
1
2
3
4
5
4. I am confident that I can enhance and develop new working relationships with various groups/agencies.
1
2
3
4
5
5. The conference content was relevant to my work.
1
2
3
4
5
6. The conference was effective in addressing current EHDI issues.
1
2
3
4
5
7. The information presented in Plenary Session I, by Teresa Caraway, was useful.
1
2
3
4
5
8. The information presented in Plenary Session II, by Arnold Noyek, was useful.
1
2
3
4
5
9. The information presented in Plenary Session III, by Rachel Coleman, was useful.
1
2
3
4
5
10. The information presented in Plenary Session IV, by Harold Johnson, was useful.
1
2
3
4
5
11. The length of the conference was adequate for learning.
1
2
3
4
5
12. The length of time available for networking with others was adequate.
1
2
3
4
5
13. The process for obtaining Continuing Education Units (CEUs) was easy to understand.
1
2
3
4
5
14. The pre-registration process was well organized.
1
2
3
4
5
15. The on-site registration process was well organized.
1
2
3
4
5
16. Conference staff effectively answered questions and assisted participants.
1
2
3
4
5
17. The hotel meeting facilities were appropriate for the conference.
1
2
3
4
5
18. The conference provided adequate audio-visual equipment and technical support.
1
2
3
4
5
19. What specific topics would you like included on the conference program in the future?
20. Additional comments/suggestions/observations: